Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Peer Evaluation: The End of the End

A screenshot of Jessica's blog.

 So I was assigned to evaluate Jessica Vavrinec's blog. Her main focus has been on young adults and gearing Shakespeare towards them.

  • Posts
    • Quantity: It looks to me like she has done enough posts to get a good idea of what she has done. I think she did about 9 different posts relating to her main focus, and 31 in all.
    • Content: She has a lot of good variety in her posts, with several book reviews, several more expository-type blogs, a comparison between a modern play (Wicked) and Shakespeare (Midsummer Night's Dream),  and textual analyses of Shakespeare. She also did a video analysis of something found on Youtube.
    • Format: Jessica is very good about tagging all of her blogs with the learning outcomes, as well as the subject. She's been pretty consistent with this since the beginning. She used the jump break a few times, but there were a few instances where she might have used the break. All of her titles were very specific, with the snappy, attention-grabbing part, as well as the more explanatory part.
  • Research
    • Thematic Focus: The theme is definitely clear throughout the blog. Jessica had a focus very early on. I think her design is also meant to appeal to a younger crowd, which is probably part of her audience.
    • Thesis & Cohesion: Her latest hub post satisfies all the requirements of a good hub post. She hyperlinks, her thesis is clear and makes an argument, and she's well organized. 
    • Sources: There is a little less cohesion in this portion of the blog. Jessica does have a sources page, but her hub post doesn't mention it, and some of her earlier posts also do not link to it. However, her sources page does link appropriately. She also has a blog post about scholarly sources.
  • Personal & Social
    • Author identity: I think Jessica did a really good job of this part. She has an obvious About Me widget on her blog, with a picture. I also have really been able to get a sense of her personality through her writing. It helps that I have talked to her in class, but her personality shines through in everything she writes.
    • Documentation of Process: Jessica does a good job of this too. For example, in her post about young adult literature, she almost formats the post in a stream of conciousness style, where the reader gets carried along with her thought processes.
    • Interactions: It looks like Jessica only responded to questions in the comments, from what I've seen. Most of the comments were not replied to, at least in the last month.
  • Design
    • Appropriate to Theme: I feel like the design seems to go more with Jessica's personality than her actual subject, but it's not something that detracts from the aesthetic of the blog.
    • Side content: All the side content seems relevant and not at all distracting.
So there you go Jessica! Hopefully I did you justice. I think your blog is great!